CONTACT US: Contact info
'After-birth abortion' and arguments from potential
Abortion, infanticide and allowing babies to die, 40 years on
Abortion, infanticide and moral context
After-birth abortion: the intuition argument
After-birth and before-birth personhood: why the baby should live
Capacity, harm and experience in the life of persons as equals
Concern for our vulnerable prenatal and neonatal children: a brief reply to Giubilini and Minerva
In defence of academic freedom: bioethics journals under siege
Infanticide and moral consistency
Infanticide, moral status and moral reasons: the importance of context
Infanticide: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva
Is the pro-choice position for infanticide 'madness'?
Killing fetuses and killing newborns
Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and 'after-birth abortion'
Moral uncertainty and the moral status of early human life
Of course the baby should live: against 'after-birth abortion'
Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva
Philosophy, critical thinking and 'after-birth abortion: why should the baby live?'
Potentials and burdens: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva
Public distress as a moral consideration in after-birth abortion
Response to: Is the pro-choice position for infanticide 'madness'?
Should policy ethics come in two colours: green or white?
Some comments on the paper 'after-birth abortion: why should the baby live?'
The common premise for uncommon conclusions
The Groningen Protocol for newborn euthanasia; which way did the slippery slope tilt?
The Italian reaction to the Giubilini and Minerva paper
The moral significance of being born
The performativity of personhood
Why should the baby live? Human right to life and the precautionary principle
Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva